We at Stalkwatch have brought you the story, in recent days, that we know the identity of Iain Hall’s latest sniper, ‘Sockpuppet’. As we said, we did not wish to out anybody. We ignored the arrogant comments at Hall’s stalk blog, and intended to use our superior position to broker a peace that would be honourable for all. Alas, it is with heavy heart that I report to you that we have failed to discharge our duties. As I write this, the various attack blogs established by Hall are still available online, with the photos and names of perceived enemies (as well as random associates whom Hall hopes are enemies). SP and Hall have basically re-affirmed their vow to continue stalking. As such, we at StalkWatch have no choice but to reveal the identity of SockPuppet.
Our Stalkwatch senses first began tingling when, on the evening of November 5th, Dave G (of Pure Poison fame) left a first-time comment.
I was perplexed to see that, only minutes later, Sockpuppet had turned up at Hall’s blog, citing the comment in full:
It was obvious that Sockpuppet had only just checked Stalkwatch. So, having installed a stat counter earlier that day, I checked who the visitors had been.
Establishing Sockpuppet’s identity was quite simply. At that time of night, there was virtually no traffic, and it rapidly became clear that there was only one suspect IP address from the time in question. The owner of this IP actually visited twice. The IP looks like this:
As many readers may know, obtaining an IP address is relatively useless in and of itself. This information will only tell you very general information about your otherwise anonymous visitor.
However, it is possible to learn something more about your visitor if you type the IP address into your WordPress blog. This is what we did, and there was only one match:
In other words, Sockpuppet is none other than Ray Dixon (or, given the similar levels of literacy, perhaps Dixon’s cat).
It is fitting that he chose a swine as his avatar, as with his sanctimonious attempts at internet policing, all the while intimidating others beneath a pseudonym, he truly is the pig of the internets.
For hypocrisy, look no further than these comments from Dixon (of not too Bright):
I really wonder just what pleasure you get out of that sort of narky & snarly shite. You must have very low self esteem if you can’t even sneer at others under your own name.
This from a man who does not dare to criticise Groupthink or Dave G using his own name. In the same comment thread, he says:
As for the blog author – well if you allow that sort of crap to go on under a pseudonym it’s a reflection on you.
I wonder if Mr Dixon is as frank and forthright with his host, Mr Hall? I’m sure that readers will have other examples of Dixon’s monumental hypocrisy. Some more here:
Is SockPuppet on your passport, Mr Dixon?
It’s a rule that seems to have escaped Mr Dixon in recent times. What does he say when he is anonymous?
…the F*ckjobs at st*orkwatch can all go off and top themselves…
Dixon and Hall will no doubt be seething that yet another internet scheme has gone awry. Hall in particular is becoming a caricature, so numerous and grotesque are his many internet failures. This will be recorded as another sordid chapter in the Encyclopaedia.
They will blame the present author for their predicament. They won’t acknowledge that nobody forced Mr Dixon to adopt a pseudonym, by which to attack others. They won’t acknowledge that nobody forced Mr Dixon to join the ranks of a known stalker. They won’t acknowledge that Mr Hall could have prevented this outing at any time, by simply removing his stalk content from the internet, content which is without any sane justification. No, these two will continue to blame everybody but themselves, and will pretend that the current situation has nothing to do with their own behaviour. It matters not – the documentary record is there for all to see. Again, we had hoped to avoid this situation, but Hall chose stalking over Dixon. It is as simple as that.
Until next time, StalkWatchers.
Tags: Iain Hall, Of Swine and Men, Ray Dixon, Sockpuppet
November 9, 2009 at 5:44 pm |
Sockpuppet wrote a post today on Hall’s blog about Dixon’s favourite topic: boat people and refugees. Sockpuppet pretty much takes the same line about the issue as Dixon.
So that’s where Dixon’s been hiding all day.
November 9, 2009 at 5:50 pm |
Ray you are a hypocritical idiot.
November 9, 2009 at 5:52 pm |
Yes, I wonder if somebody should inform Scott of Groupthink, and Dave of PP, that the anonymous dung-flinger is none other than a Janus-faced turncoat.
November 9, 2009 at 5:58 pm |
I am not Sock Puppet you fool and your tenuous evidence is just laughable. Really pathetic. If you really think this stupid post of yours bothers me in the slightest that’s probably more a reflection of your owm psychological problems and low self esteem. I have had much worse said about me – and some of it was true – but your blog is an anonymous joke that no one takes seriously. Say whatever you like but you’ve now named two incorrect people as the notorious SockPuppet. Who will you target next – Kevin Rudd? Piss off.
November 9, 2009 at 6:07 pm |
Ray, the IP evidence says otherwise. There’s always a possibility that you are not, in fact, SP, and that your cat/chimney sweep is using your IP address for mischief. If so, please clarify that for us.
The real story here, of course, is the shockingly callous indifference of Hall to his friend’s plight. What’s that saying again? No honour among trolls?
November 9, 2009 at 6:12 pm |
97 times Ray! You’ve visited this site more than I have. Why the interest if it’s not you? OH SHIT IT IS
November 9, 2009 at 6:16 pm |
You can now add “liar” to your impressive CV, Raybo.
The IP match is compelling and would stand on its own – however just about every other whiff of “Sockpuppet” also smells like you. There is a catalogue of circumstantial evidence that this post hasn’t drawn on, simply in the interests of brevity.
If you aren’t “Sockpuppet” then your mate Iain will no doubt leap to your defence and support your claim. But I won’t hold my breath. Iain is probably laughing at you as loudly as we are. The phrase “sold up the river” springs to mind.
November 9, 2009 at 6:34 pm |
The gutless piglet cant even own up to his own online behaviour. No wonder he excuses Hall’s behaviour.
What a morose moron. Game, set, match; cunt.
November 9, 2009 at 6:37 pm |
I’m not going to defend myself from your absurd accusations but you really should know that you have stuffed up with your times. Work it out dickhead, your times are all out of whack. And that’s just one mistake you’ve made.
You really are a desperate lunatic to write a post like this based on that sort of evidence. And by the way, installing an add-on to spy on who is visiting your site and when etc, is pretty creepy and stalky in itself.
Look, I am not Sockpuppet – but why am I bothering to even say it to you. See you later – you are real idiot.
November 9, 2009 at 6:43 pm |
“The leads aren’t weak.”
This played out as fantastic entertainment. Such a shame that these bush stalkers ruin good things.
November 9, 2009 at 7:01 pm |
Jesus wept Ray Dixon! tell me it aint so!!!
Although looking at Ray’s picture and the shirt and jacket he is wearing, not so much a pig, but a Leprechaun.
But an ugly Leprechaun to be sure.
Gee what a shame, I thought Ray was the intelligent one of the dynamic duo.”Hall & Dixon”
November 9, 2009 at 7:04 pm |
Ray Dixon:
“I’m well aware that there has been crap on both sides, but unless people are prepared to bury the hatchet it’ll never stop. ”
You were offered a chance to bury the hatchet, Ray, but your own ego and arrogance got the better of you.
I’m referring more to those Internet bloggers and commenters who conduct prolonged hate campaigns against other bloggers springing from a dislike of that person.
This is not your first hate attack of Dave G, Ray.
You were attacking him way before he posted an innocent comment here, weren’t you? So your excuse is also bullshit like your denial. Don’t worry, I have the screen shot.
November 9, 2009 at 7:40 pm |
Poor Ray is still in denial. Ray has no idea how the Internet and IP addresses work. Ray also doesn’t know much about defamation. Ray is not very Bright at all.
November 9, 2009 at 7:44 pm |
wow man, ray dixon!!!!! that would ‘axplain’ why you were so insistent that Dave answer your question why he was commenting on this blog. Thats such a ray Dixon trait. ‘answer me!!! answer me!!! I demand you answer me!!!’ it also ‘axplains’ why socky seemed quite familiar with dave’s blog and what he writes.
November 9, 2009 at 7:55 pm |
but you really should know that you have stuffed up with your times.
No, the times are 100% correct. I know this because I realised it was you a few days ago when I was checking in real time. If the times look different it’s because QLD is not on daylight savings time.
Look, I am not Sockpuppet – but why am I bothering to even say it to you. See you later – you are real idiot.
Okay. Let’s assume, for the sake of argument, that this is true. You who profess to be completely indifferent to this site have visited multiple times over the course of today. At one point, you spent about two and a half hours on this site, in one go. I know this because your IP when commenting and visiting is exactly the same as the one pictured above, in the main post. It’s not exactly the behaviour of somebody who isn’t watching the Stalkwatchers closely.
And I see that Hall had lied on your behalf now. He’s always been an illiterate, a stalker, an inbred and a pigfucker, but he can now be called a liar. He certainly can’t be called a good friend, as a good friend would simply have gotten rid of the stalky blog stuff, and saved Ray’s paper-thin hide.
Oh well. Iain, I see you like You Tube. Here’s a quicky for you:
November 9, 2009 at 8:21 pm |
LIE LIE LIE.
add that to their shameless pathetic internet behaviour.
November 9, 2009 at 8:48 pm |
Poor Ray has a lot to learn. Now he’s going to blue some bloke from Bright;
“Don’t worry, Percy, Woolies will go ahead – and if Lee is thinking of organising boycotts when it opens he better think again. That would be asking for confrontation and I, for one, will certainly take him on.”
Don’t use your internet skillz Raymond. You’ll lose.
November 9, 2009 at 8:49 pm |
“Don’t worry, Percy, Woolies will go ahead – and if Lee is thinking of organising boycotts when it opens he better think again. That would be asking for confrontation and I, for one, will certainly take him on.”
They may not necessarily fight him. They may be content to merely snigger, and, as they put their hands to their mouths, say the word ‘Oink!’.
November 9, 2009 at 8:55 pm |
Incredibly, he’s still got the hide to lie at Hall’s. Not one for taking responsibility, our Dixon.
Ray, if you still profess your innocence, care to tell us why you spent hours at StalkWatch today? Why every time you visit or comment at Hall’s, your IP address shows up here?
As they say on Media Watch – PWNED!
November 9, 2009 at 9:23 pm |
“installing an add-on to spy on who is visiting your site and when etc, is pretty creepy and stalky in itself.”
Oh, lord, Ray hasn’t even heard of them until tonight – most blogs have them dickson. You’re just pissed you didn’t think of it.
Why don’t you fuck off back the rock you crawled out from and leave everyone alone.
November 9, 2009 at 9:28 pm |
Exactly. All WordPress blogs have a basic statcounter, and millions of bloggers worldwide use them.
But who cares. Shorter Ray:
“Foh Ah Am teh Mayah of Alberquerque!”
November 9, 2009 at 10:33 pm |
Dixon has left two comments at Hall’s blog now telling the other stalker “he doesn’t care” Yea sure you don’t Dixon.
How predictable is that?
November 9, 2009 at 10:42 pm |
Dixon and Hall trying to explain their way out of this one will be like that Youtube clip of Ma and Pa Kettle doing mathematics.
November 9, 2009 at 11:52 pm |
I notice Ray’s comment (nicely posted by Iain) has an out. He claims that there was another SockPuppet before him.
I just want to make it clear that if SockPuppet begins stalking and anonymously attacking again, or if any other charatcers pop up out of the woodwork, Ray will receive the blame.
November 10, 2009 at 7:19 am |
keep up the good work in outing Ray Dixon.
I live in Bright and this scumbag is the most hated piece of dirt in the town.
Heck, he’s even run for Council in the last three elections and lost each time – the last he only got 150 odd votes!
Keep at him, he’s a true hatemonger, a bigot and a sociopath. Oh, and if you want any more dirt on him… [edited by Siteowner]
Ed: Let’s not defame anybody, Baldrick. Anything said about Dixon has to be clearly marked as personal opinion, or backed with evidence.
November 10, 2009 at 9:00 am |
They will blame the present author for their predicament. They won’t acknowledge that nobody forced Mr Dixon to adopt a pseudonym, by which to attack others. They won’t acknowledge that nobody forced Mr Dixon to join the ranks of a known stalker. They won’t acknowledge that Mr Hall could have prevented this outing at any time, by simply removing his stalk content from the internet… No, these two will continue to blame everybody but themselves, and will pretend that the current situation has nothing to do with their own behaviour.
Which is exactly what Iain has done this morning – without an explicit or outright denial that “Sockpuppet” is Ray Dixon. Instead he just queries the strength of Stalkwatch’s case, suggesting our evidence is “weak”. No it isn’t. Ray’s IP appeared in a very narrow window between a Stalkwatch post and a comment by “Sockpuppet”. This means that “Sockpuppet” is either Ray, Ray’s wife, Ray’s cat or Ray’s live-in housekeeper (a la Alice in The Brady Bunch).
You two morons have also been damned by your own response to Stalkwatch’s investigation. Ray turned up here and commented twice. Barely a word elsewhere. This stupendous underreaction from the bloke who once threatened to call the AFP because some troll slagged off his footy team on Asinine Opinion. Guilty conscience, Ray? Then there’s the question of why “Sockpuppet” removed Dave’s picture from Iain’s blog. Why would someone not known to Dave do such a thing?
Ray, you fail. Iain, you always fail. But look on the bright side – now you’ve got each other to fail with.
November 10, 2009 at 10:37 am |
Just to quote myself in light of Ray’s latest post:
November 10, 2009 at 1:09 pm |
Baldrick’s comment above is outrageous and should be edited or deleted. You can make allegations like that without any kind of evidence.
November 10, 2009 at 1:10 pm |
can = can’t
November 10, 2009 at 1:19 pm |
agree, baldrick’s comment is outrageous and too far. edit or delete immediately.
November 10, 2009 at 1:20 pm |
The comment will be edited when the powers that be get a chance. SW does not approve or endorse the inference by ‘Baldrick”.
November 10, 2009 at 2:53 pm |
I just want to reiterate that he has once again named the wrong person. I am not Sock Puppet.
Ray is lying. We’ve given clear evidence, and he’s just given blanket denials. On the evening of 5th of November, when SP obviously had visited here, there were no other visits but Ray’s for about half an hour. If there were other leads, we would have investigated them also, but it’s perfectly clear that Ray visited that night, and that Ray is the only person who could have been Sockpuppet. This doesn’t rule out his cat visiting, or the possibility that Sockpuppet was initially used by somebody else. However, it’s under Ray’s IP, and he has to take responsibility for it.
He now also thinks that installing a statcounter is ‘spying’. LOL. This from a guy who spends all his spare time at this blog. Watch out, everybody – Ray Dixon’s going to sue the internets.
November 10, 2009 at 3:01 pm |
“Spying” according to teh Ray:
- Installing a statcounter on your own blog
“Not Spying” according to teh Ray:
- Setting up fake accounts to watch other people’s Twitter feed
- Stealing and reposting other people’s personal pictures
- Sending off bottles of malt whisky to obtain personal info
- Stealing and manipulating posts to portray someone as a Nazi
Ray’s moral compass = skew-wiff.
November 10, 2009 at 3:13 pm |
Not to mention reading everyone’s Twitter account all day and night then passing comment about how much he hates Twitter and Twitter is killing blogging.
I just read Ray’s comment on Iain’s blog.
It’s seem clear now that the site in question is in fact the work of one obsessed loose cannon. The frenzied comments, the stupid aliases that don’t appear anywhere else on the Internet and the same twisted and deceitful interpretations put on everything all add up to it being the work of one person alone, and I’m pretty sure I know who that is.
I’m pretty sure you don’t know who that is at all, Ray Dixon. There is no one crazy enough to be obsessed about you but when you’re spying on everyone all day and all night and behaving like a two-faced hypocrite, well more than one person is going to take notice. Then along came Sockpuppet which is the silliest thing you’ve done in your internet history. What were you thinking, Ray?
November 10, 2009 at 3:59 pm |
But you have to wonder about the quality of teachers being employed by Victoria’s department of Education when they indecently expose themselves in public., Just as you have to wonder about what possessed, Dr Jason Wilson, a man with a reputable teaching position at Newcastle University, or even Dave Gaukroger a writer for Crikey scaring “little old ladies” in the streets of by indecently exposing themselves to all and sundry
What’s the bet Iain saved those pics in the same Windows 95 folder where he keeps his downloads from Abby Winters?
November 10, 2009 at 4:04 pm |
Public morals according to Iain Hall.
http://iainhall.wordpress.com/2009/11/10/nude-groupies-pwned-by-ex-and-dead-porn-star/#comments
The site is supposed to funny and satirical but all that they are doing in this post is showing that they are perverts who think that breaking the law (about wilfully exposing genitals in a public place) is in some sense funny.
I find a lesson in public morals from a nitwit who spends his days beating off to amatuer porn paid for with welfare dollars about as useful as a swimming lesson from Harold Holt.
November 10, 2009 at 4:57 pm |
What a sad duo. Getting one’s kit off for a bet is an Australian tradition. Iain deserves to be deported.
November 10, 2009 at 4:59 pm |
It’s good to see Iain is still playing Mafia Wars (as seen from his screen shot) while he hangs his mate Ray Dixon out to dry.
Iain today:
would frankly be more than happy to leave these tired old battles behind me
Iain this afternoon.
And like clockwork, sookpuppet Ray Dixon chimes in with his I don’t agree with this but good on you for doing it routine.
Truly, they are a pair of dickheads.
November 10, 2009 at 4:59 pm |
BTW the way Iain, it’s nice to know you’re persevering with Mafia Wars. For fucks’ sake get a job you unemployed loser.
http://iainhall.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/jason-wilson3.jpg
November 10, 2009 at 7:19 pm |
I wonder what Ray Dixon thinks of the Iain Hall playing his usual trick of implying threats against employers in this comment?
http://iainhall.wordpress.com/2009/11/10/nude-groupies-pwned-by-ex-and-dead-porn-star/#comment-44489
More awkard silences from the Sergreant Schultz of the internets. “Iain’s not a stalker, I see nothing NOTHING”
November 10, 2009 at 7:33 pm |
It’s because Iain and Sookpuppet Ray Dixon are two peas in a pod, Henry. They are both lying scumbags with obvious personality defects.
November 11, 2009 at 12:19 pm |
Iain takes a break from Mafia Wars and Abby Winters to throw up some rebuttal ‘evidence’. He thinks that screengrabs of IP addresses of “Sockpuppet” posts after Stalkwatch’s outing of Dixon is going to convince the world that it wasn’t Dixon. Which is a bit like claiming you’re innocent of a hit-run because you lent your car to someone else… two days after it happened.
Tell you what, Iain, repeat after me: “Ray Dixon has never, ever posted on my blog as “Sockpuppet”. No other wishy-washy statements, that exact one.
If you can’t do it then shut the hell up. And if you do do it, we’ll take great pleasure in producing our evidence and skewering you as a hyporitical liar too.
November 11, 2009 at 5:05 pm |
I saw that effort. It’s as pathetic as it is hilarious. Two days after the fact, Hall is claiming that SockPuppet has a different IP. It lookds desperate to me. We know that Senior Cunstable Dixon has at least 2 or 3 IPs. We also know that it’s pretty easy to assign the character to somebody after the fact and thereby get a different IP.
His posts are getting increasingly desperate, too. He claims that ‘latte sippers’ support rape now. Few people are bothering to comment at his bloated, decaying corpse of a blog.
November 11, 2009 at 5:15 pm |
Jeremy responds to Hall’s trolling, and Hall hits back:
I use the term “latte sipper’ as a generalised indicator of leftism and the “cautioning” of rapists in England has been at the behest of the leftist Labour government so my headline and post are entirely reasonable and they “slur” no one who is undeserving of approbation , now I know that you mistakenly think that all types of “community corrections” orders and the like are effective crime deterrents but surely even you can concede that a police caution is inadequate for rape, strangely you seem unable to say so.
Maybe the latter sippers have diluted the Queen’s English, but as far as I’m aware, Hall, we still have beginnings and endings to sentences you rambling derro. This comment looks like automatic writing as undertaken by a lobotomy patient.
November 11, 2009 at 7:13 pm |
Jeremy responds to Hall’s trolling …
Some dogs are capable of learning not to make the same mistakes over and over. Heck, some rodents are even clever enough to learn not to keep feeding from electrified food sources.
And then there’s Jeremy fucking Sear, continuing to crawl back to the pile of vomit that is Inane Hall’s blog every time he’s provoked.
November 11, 2009 at 7:18 pm |
Nice site by the way Travis. I don’t think much of your two most devoted readers, but you’re doing a pretty good job of showing them up for the clowns they are.
November 11, 2009 at 7:19 pm |
Okay you guys, I admit that I am Sockpuppet. But seriously who cares? It’s just a bit of fun.
Don’t take yourselves so seriously huh?
Editor’s Note: We at Stalkwatch make no claim that the Ray Dixon above is the real deal. We also stress that he is not a sockpuppet of ours.
November 11, 2009 at 8:19 pm |
*I* am Spartacus… I mean Sockpuppet.
November 11, 2009 at 8:29 pm |
No’ I ‘ am Spartacus… I mean Sockpuppet.
November 11, 2009 at 8:36 pm |
Ray, if that is you and you are owning up. Iain Hall is quietly sitting in his noddy car parked in his shed with the doors closed at the moment, slowly gassing himself.
Please let it be you Ray.
November 12, 2009 at 7:59 am |
Ray says:
It’s a pity the siite owner won’t apologise but let’s face it, he isn’t even man enough to use his own name in public. He’s just a pathetic wimp.
No Ray. You’ve been busted sockpuppeting. We’ve given you the proof. We checked the stats, and there were literally no other people it could have been. More circumstantially, we know you’re Hall’s only friend, and therefore the only person stupid enough to have been Sockpuppet. Your denials just make you look like a coward, and one with a particularly glass jaw.
November 12, 2009 at 11:26 am |
I would be surprised if there is more than three of them in total despite there being a whole swag of different identities in the comments threads.
Pretty ironic coming from Iain, whose blog is populated mainly by himself, Ray Dixon, “Sockpuppet” and “Len”/”David Davidson” – who are about three people in total.
November 12, 2009 at 11:29 am |
Still no response to my challenge to Hall to state that “Ray Dixon has never posted on [his] blog as “Sockpuppet”. He refuses to support Ray’s blanket denial. Either Ray is lying and Iain refuses to lie – or Iain won’t come to the aid of a mate. Disgusting really.
November 12, 2009 at 2:28 pm |
Latest from “Sockpuppet”:
How often do you wear a smoking jacket Elijah? When and where?
When you smoke some fine pork. Much like in this thread
November 12, 2009 at 2:34 pm |
That metrosexual post from Sockpuppet is so Ray Dixon. He can’t even disguise his own style. Plus the tryhard “humour” in it is so Ray Dixon as well. Jesus wept!
November 12, 2009 at 2:46 pm |
Plus Ray D*xon’s usual the poof jokes, Jake.
What’s a bet as soon as a woman starts posting at Iain’s (heaven forbid) Sookpuppet Ray will try and introduce her to his pork sword, Sylvia.
Hey Ray, how does it feel to get caught by people smarter than you? Does it smart? (Iain’s used to it so he just buries his head in Mafia Wars)
November 12, 2009 at 4:39 pm |
I would be surprised if there is more than three of them in total despite there being a whole swag of different identities in the comments threads.
Actually Iain, we at Stalkwatch have more commenters than you, and I’d expect we’d get more hits also. Your blog is basically dying, Iain, despite pathetic attempts at trolling by using sockpuppets, and claiming that ‘latte sippers’ endorse rape. Nope, I predict that your site will be full of tumbleweeds faster than you can say that Ray Dixon is a lying, stalking, sockpuppeting prick.
November 12, 2009 at 4:47 pm |
I like how Ray D*xon thinks this blog is the work of one person. It’s hilarious watching him trying to use psychology to figure out who it is.
Give it up, Reg D*xon, you f*cking ‘poof’.
November 12, 2009 at 5:16 pm |
Ray Dixon used at least 5 aliases to comment on my blog* until his ego got the better of him and he commented under his own name and with his own gravatar.
*thisisnotalpineopinion.wordpress
November 12, 2009 at 5:16 pm |
Hall’s delusions keep coming (as does the mangled grammar):
Oh yeah the creepy emails Keep coming Ray
The authors and contributors to this site have never exchanged emails with Hall. He’s either lying, or being wound up by an impersonator.
They have had their bluff called and they have nothing left, except to wish me dead.
Except that it wasn’t a bluff, and the pathetic Ray Dixon was correctly outed at Sockpuppet.
And nobody ‘wishes you dead’, Hall, you sanctimonious fucker.
We do wish, however, that your name online will forever be associated with your behaviour (stalking, identity theft, malicious trolling, bribing for personal info, contacting emploeyers, etc).
November 12, 2009 at 5:21 pm |
Iain making sense or not:
If you are going to get what you want your victim has, in the first instance, to be able to deliver what you want. and secondly be amenable to the leverage that underpins the threat that is made.
No wonder he and Ray Dixon are complete fuck ups.
Ray, if you spent more time on your business than trying to police the Internet in various guises maybe you’d get some more rooms rented out.
November 12, 2009 at 7:06 pm |
Someone should make an online reservation at Graveyard Gardens in Bright under the name “A. Sockpuppet”.
November 12, 2009 at 11:51 pm |
Sighting someone’s IP isn’t the equivalent of some kinda covert listening device Ray. I mean after all, on your carnival game pricing board, how the hell do you think that dinky “A.O. stats” count gets its total?
Why not leave a message here? You have nothing to fear but fear itself.
November 13, 2009 at 12:37 pm |
Internet warrior Reg D;x*n unmasks* a sockpuppet:
I have received information that confirms the real identity of Bright’s infamous and notoriously anonymous Save Bright leader, who has been using the alias Wal Willow to stalk, harass & defame my reputation on the Internet. I’m still deciding what to do with it.
Don’t publish it, Reg, he’ll probably just deny it, regardless of whatever evidence is placed on the table.
November 13, 2009 at 1:38 pm |
to stalk, harass & defame my reputation on the Internet
What reputation? Oh, you mean the one for being a lying scumbag whose pathetic attempts at policing the Internet are laughed at from one corner of cyberspace to the other.
Ray+Dixon+is+a+hypocrite+and+a+liar+who+posts+under+various+aliases+(Sockpuppet)+after+lecturing+the+Internet+not+to+do+so.
It’s in Google now shithead.
Sylvia, Reg was caught with his hand in the till with cameras recording it all. The idiot still looks up with his limp wristed Sookpuppet saying ,”it wasn’t me”.
Tag: Iain Hall.
November 13, 2009 at 3:03 pm |
Ray’s just a big poof.
November 13, 2009 at 3:35 pm |
“One thing people never oughtta be when they’re buildin’ Noddy cars, and that’s in a hurry.”
November 13, 2009 at 10:54 pm |
Exactly
November 14, 2009 at 10:14 am |
Er, f*ck, Ray Dixon, poof.
November 14, 2009 at 9:28 pm |
Yes, Ray has his moments. You try living in Bright with him!
November 14, 2009 at 9:29 pm |
What’s goin on with Iain Hall anyway?
November 16, 2009 at 10:06 am |
Ray Dixon is still carrying on as Sockpuppet and failing hard at being funny. What a strange man.
November 16, 2009 at 10:13 am |
http://iainhall.wordpress.com/2009/11/16/jesssica-watson-doing-well-so-far/#comment-44598
(BTW, I think she’d look good naked )
Sockpuppet likes them young. Rockspider young. Disturbing.
November 16, 2009 at 10:30 am |
Iain: “Heeeeellooooo? Commenters? Helllooooooo?”
November 16, 2009 at 11:10 am |
Iain was obviously so exciting by that pic that his fingers were shaking when he typed Jessica’s name into the post title.
June 13, 2011 at 9:38 pm |
Ray (Sock Puppet) admitted it today on Iain’s blog
June 20, 2011 at 9:13 pm |
[...] Iain Hall refusing to cease his online stalking and delete his hundreds of stalking blogs, this blog declared that the sick puppet behind Sockpuppet was one Ray Dixon of [...]