Actual search phrase used to reach Stalkwatch this week:
“drawing the line between stalking and over friendliness”
Iain Hall and JF Beck still haven’t drawn it. Along with HJ and Ray Dixon, over-friendliness/stalking are still very well-represented.
Tags: Iain Hall, Iain Hall hates women, JF Beck, Of Swine and Men, Ray 'Sockpuppet' Dixon, Ray Dixon, Stalker Jim
April 13, 2011 at 12:41 pm |
“Over friendliness”..? Drawing any kind of line between stalking and any kind of friendliness at all seems rather like trying to get Jimi Hendrix to join Abba. Simply put: monumentally ignorant.
April 13, 2011 at 1:58 pm |
Lieutenant General Sockdickson is giving some greens voter the benefit of his years of experience in the military over at Chez Hole. The General says that women should be protected from fighting. Because the General knows whats right for women (and so do women, if they know whats good for them.)
Fair dunkum, is there any thing the arrogant cunt doesnt have an opinion about?
And who the fuck scrapes the dried cum from the sheets of his motel while he hovers over Halls blog all day? Why, the women of course.
P.S. Hey Reg, how about those Saints? They are playing about as well as they keep their dicks under raps.
April 14, 2011 at 9:46 pm |
Hi all, long time no stalkwatch.
On my comedy-seeking sojourn to Chez Hall today, I happened to notice this in the sidebar:
Anyone who comments at the Sandpit under a pseudonym does so on the clear understanding that by doing so they are giving any and all rights and ownership of those comments to the site-owner who may reproduce them in any form or at any other site or venue entirely at his own discretion.
Now Iain is actually giving his commenters some warning that he’s going to harvest their comments and glue them to one of his dozen stalker-blogs. Well done Iain – it’s not quite a job, but it’s progress nevertheless!
April 16, 2011 at 11:25 am |
Hall’s blog is a laugh a minute lately. Today has he moved away from Ozblogistan because Reg Dickhead told him it was coming up too low in Google. And (surprise surprise) Halls first post back is a hatchet job on Jeremy Sear, Iain lists seven reasons why Jeremy will never run for parliament (well six reasons really because he lists “Boltwatch” twice.)
Here are reasons why Iain Hall will never run for parliament:
1. Barely literate
2. No job
3. Scotchgate
4. Monster Trucker-gate
5. The very informative ED file
6-20. Each of his stalker/impersonation blogs.
Then again I think Iain would be a good comedy candidate, like the Monster Loony Party. It would be funny watching the media slowly release info about what a self important idiot he is.
April 16, 2011 at 11:29 am |
Also I saw this from Daniel the Greens voter…..
Perhaps when he’s run three or four times and lost all of them, or been absolutely thumped at the ballot box, you can draw a firm conclusion that the voters have “rejected” him.
Sounds like Daniel was talking about your tilt at the Bright council there, Reg!
April 16, 2011 at 9:08 pm |
The ED file is no more comprade. I wonder if Iain will remove his many stalking blogs now considering how many times he said he would.
April 17, 2011 at 8:36 am |
‘I received this in the in-box this morning (from a reader who wishes to remain anonymous) ”
Yep, because it’s me!
April 17, 2011 at 7:47 pm |
Good news:
http://waybackmachine.org/*/http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Iain_hall
April 18, 2011 at 12:31 am |
I am giving Iain a week or two to delete at least some of his stalk/flame blogs. And I mean DELETE, not just lock.
If no movement on that front, I will find a new home for the ED stuff, which is important info that should be on the public record.
April 18, 2011 at 12:00 pm |
You’ll be waiting awhile; Hall has always manage to come up with some limp excuse to keep his attack blogs up and running.
Anyway, at the moment he’s too busy designing a new blog theme (it’s what he does instead of work and all). All Chez Hall themes have to go through a rigorous testing procedure, to ensure they cause retinal discomfort and endanger the well-being of epileptics and pregnant women.
April 20, 2011 at 1:01 pm |
Good news Stalkwatchers. I have found some alternative digs for the marvellously informative ED pages on Hall and Dickson. This was provided to be by a contact who prefers to remain anonymous (i.e. its Reg.)
It is now up to Iain as to whether I go to the trouble of re uploading them to the web.
Iain I have a deal for you, we all know you read this site several times a day…..
Delete any two of your following stalker blogs.
http://trolltalesandtrue.wordpress.com/
http://ilovebourbon.wordpress.com/
http://niceperson709.wordpress.com/
http://niceperson907.wordpress.com/
You can decide which two. But they must be deleted. Not just locked.
The Stalkwatch team will check in seven days if all four of these stalker blogs is still online. If they are then back up online go the ED files for you and Reg.
The ball is in your court.
Signed: “The Sax”
P.S. the potential new home for the ED stuff will get lots of traffic and google hits, it will probably even come in ahead of Iains failed Ozblogastan page, LOL.
April 20, 2011 at 9:03 pm |
I was about to that you may as well post it all now. It looks like the blogs are still there, however, Iain has moved 19 of the posts to iainhall.wordpress.com.
What will he do? Delete his filthy stalking blogs? Or keep it all at iainhall.wordpress.com?
April 20, 2011 at 10:29 pm |
Personally I wouldn’t like to see the ED pages return. They’ve served their purpose and should probably be retired. I think they should probably die with ED; the copy can be saved if necessary.
That said, Hall won’t delete any of those blogs. Despite a raft of attempts to strike deals with him, he has never deleted anything; he’s only ever locked, moved or badged blogs. There’s always some disingenuous, mealy-mouthed excuse about why he can’t possibly delete the object(s) in question.
April 20, 2011 at 10:43 pm |
It was a generous offer by the Sax, but it seems that Iain has scorned it, by shifting his (many) stalking posts/photos into his main blog. Speaking of which, it looks as though it was designed by a blind chimp on acid.
April 21, 2011 at 11:39 am |
So which of his stalker posts has he shifted across, Travis? (I’m not trawling through his dog’s breakfast of a blog to find them.)
I see Iain is still fiddling with design. It’s just a shame that “minimalist” isn’t a concept in his artistic vocabulary. The current background colour reminds me of a bowel movement after a particularly dodgy Thai meal.
Quick tip Iain: perhaps if the writing was interesting and articulate – instead of “You could not invent this shit” and “Un-fucking-believable”, then you wouldn’t have to rely so much on the purdy colours and moving GIFs to trawl in readers.
April 21, 2011 at 9:27 pm |
I won’t link to the stalker posts here, but they include those on ‘Niceperson709′ which have photos of Iain’s supposed enemies. A total of 19 of these have been shifted over to his current blog of shame.
I take this as a sign that Iain lacks any semblance of good faith. He must be some kind of bizarre sadomasochist, to carry on like this in public.
April 22, 2011 at 1:07 pm |
Yeah well whatever games Iain is playing with posts, my offer still stands. If he deletes two of those blogs as a sign of good will then the ED files will stay in the closet. But if Sylvia is right and he does nothing than I will have them back on line before you can say “Noddy car”.
BTW I see Iain and Reg are having their weekly circle jerk over refugees.
Iain… Refugees are criminals and we should shoot them!
Reg… no we should treat them humanely
Iain… But Europe is full of them and so is Gagdippys hometown
Reg… well they should move to the country, I think everyone should move to the country (and stay in my shitty motel)
April 22, 2011 at 1:11 pm |
I thought Gagdippy made a motza out of playing his triangle?? What’s he doing living in the western suburbs of Sydney?
April 22, 2011 at 1:13 pm |
I take this as a sign that Iain lacks any semblance of good faith. He must be some kind of bizarre sadomasochist, to carry on like this in public.
Hall and Reg have been pissing about the ED pages for years. Now is their chance to be generous to Halls stalking victims, and we will kill off the ED stuff for good.
Or they can do nothing and the ED pages will return. What can be fairer than that?
This issue will show the blogosophere just what Iain is… a bloke who wants to put the past behind him, or an unreformed stalker who wants to keep his ammo.
Whats it to be Iain??
April 22, 2011 at 8:56 pm |
Good luck Sax, but like I said, Iain won’t delete a thing. He’s too much of a tool. Plus, having the ED stuff online lets him play the hard-done-by victim (“Oh those heartless bullies… I have done nothing to deserve all this.”)
If gigdiary is indeed a ‘working musician’ then he can’t be working too much. He lives in Toongabbie; nobody would live there by choice if they could afford to live somewhere else. It is the rectum of the civilised world.
Actually, he hangs out at Iain’s blog, so maybe living in a rectum isn’t that inappropriate.
April 23, 2011 at 4:15 pm |
Another few days to go and still no movement. Just Iain posting his usual mystery crap.
Iain, my offer is sincere. Please think about it carefully.
If you want to start clearing the internet of flame war sites (including this one) then there needs to be concessions made on both sides.
Nobody wants the ED stuff to go back up. I dont want to do it. Sylvia said she doesnt think it should go back up. But if you can’t delete your stalking sites, what choice do we have???
You have the ball here. Will you put it down and say “the game is over”? Or will you kick it and say “let’s keep playing?”
Stop with your silly riddles and Youtube clips and just do the right thing.
Signed,
The Sax
April 23, 2011 at 8:48 pm |
Ray is staying strangely silent on this one. He’s been sleeping with a dog and knows that he’s page will go back up too since he runs interference for and encourages Hall.
May as well put both of the scumbag’s pages up now.
April 24, 2011 at 10:32 am |
Looks like I was right about the disingenous, mealy-mouthed excuse.
Your offer was genuine, but Hall is incorrigible and too bound up in expecting people to feel sorry for him.
April 24, 2011 at 2:29 pm |
Judging by Iain’s recent (bizarre) posts, Iain is maintaining his online stalking. Given a choice between peace with honour, or endless flame wars, Hall and Reg choose flame wars each and every time.
April 24, 2011 at 4:13 pm |
Well Hall does, I’m not sure about Reg. Unlike Hall – who has no job, business or reputation to defend – Reg has been complaining about the ED stuff and demanding its removal for ages. I wonder how he now feels about its restoration, all because of Iain’s determination to keep his weird, disjointed and utterly pointless stalking blogs online.
At the very least, Hall’s refusal of Sax’s offer will show Reg just what kind of horse he’s hitched his wagon to.
April 24, 2011 at 10:21 pm |
Hall always said he wouldn’t back down an inch until the ED page was removed (who cares how) and it was. I guess Iain’s actions of late have again proved and justified the reason for Stalk Watch.
April 24, 2011 at 11:21 pm |
Iain (and Reg) just have a think about what you are doing.
Nobody is blackmailing anybody. How can it be blackmail if (as you reckon) the ED stuff is on Wayback? How can we be “blackmailing” you with something that you reckon is still online?
The options are pretty simple.
If you delete two of your blogs, noone restores the ED stuff and eventually it will disappear from Google searches for “Iain Hall” and “Reg Dickson”.
Or you can keep spinning it as “blackmail”. This will show the blogging world that you are determined to keep your flame/stalker blogs online. The ED stuff will go up at a new site. And you will not have a leg to stand on the next time you try to claim you are being “bullied”.
You have until the weekend to rethink your position. Will it be goodbye ED site and two of Iains flame blogs? Or will it be ‘as you were’ and ‘hello http://iainhall.?????.com?
Signed,
The (ever hopeful) Sax
April 25, 2011 at 12:26 pm |
I think you’d better change your nick to ‘The Neville’ (as in Chamberlain) – because that’s how much success you’re likely to have. He’s already beating the drum today about his own victimhood.
April 25, 2011 at 2:52 pm |
Iain sent a bottle of scotch through the mail to his most hated enemy after receiving fake information on another hated enemy’s identity. By his own definition he deserves everything he has gotten.
April 25, 2011 at 3:14 pm |
Typical of Iain Hall to knock off some news report about a wanker who posted kiddy porn on tribute sites to murder children…. then say that he has “put up with similar treatment”.
No you havent Hall you bozo. The worst Ive seen about you is a photoshopped pic of you boning a goat. Not that you are inexperienced in publishing humorous animal-sex mash ups yourself.
Fair enough, if you want to avoid doing the honorable thing and keep playing the victim then you know what will happen. We gave you the chance. Obviously you are more of an irreedemable scumbag than I thought.
April 25, 2011 at 3:44 pm |
Hall is much more perp than victim. I wouldn’t be surprised if QLD were to come knocking on his door one day, for his relentless stalking.
Nonetheless, it’s hilarious how girly-man Hall insists on playing the victim, like the passive-aggressive putz he is. Along with Reg and Husky, his blog is like a support group for passive-aggressive stalkers to reconnect with the limp-wristed, whiny part of themselves.
April 26, 2011 at 10:28 pm |
There are some rather nasty scrotes who have been trying to blackmail me into removing my archives of their villainy and I am not going to give in to such crap.
“villiany”?? You are talking out your arse.
Alright Iain, have it your way matey. The offer to start clearing the internet of the great flame war of 2006-8 was genuine. But you want to make sure it all stays online and keep on playing the victim.
Well the ED stuff will be going back online in the next few days. The link will be posted here when it is finished. You cant say you werent given a chance.
I thought you might have been fair minded enough to do the right thing. But you really are the sanctimonious self righteous never-wrong prick that everyone else says you are.
April 27, 2011 at 11:03 am |
Iain sez:
To be honest Luzu I used google translate to get the title and sign off for this post and I chose Russian because I thought that the unfamiliar script would further bamboozle the scum bags. and I obviously did because they just whined about not being able to understand the message.
Actually, Stalkwatch’s resident Slavophone tells us that what you posted was plainly ungrammatical gibberish, run through google translator. Much like your English prose, really.
They constantly attack me for my politics and the quality of my writing,
Nobody is forcing you to post your semi-literate diatribes in a public space.
deriding me because I have a role swap arrangement with my wife which gives me the time to blog
A ‘role swap’? Are you suggesting that the ordinary stay-at-home mum spends her time (and the taxpayer’s dime) bloging (sic), stalking, and tending to Noddy Cars?
Why they would think that I would just roll over now for fear of a rather weak threat just shows how stupid they are.
Since there was neither blackmail nor threat, this episode shows how stupid YOU are. You were given a peace offering – a commenter here offered to remove old material from the blog wars. You could have chosen to move on, but instead you continue to play the whiny little bitch, stalking everybody you can, and moaning about being a ‘victim’ of ‘bullying’. This display is rather unmanly for supposed man of the people, Iain.
April 27, 2011 at 11:46 am |
Iain, how come you never link to your various stalking/flame blogs from your main blog?
Oh that’s right… because then the semi-sensible readers at the Sandpit would see exactly what type of Internet creature you are. It’s much easier to play the victim when you conceal the worst of your bastardry.
April 27, 2011 at 10:52 pm |
Hall’s blog offers a laugh every visit. On top of the idiotic ‘royal wedding updates’ from his imaginary friend in London, now he’s got a post about “Darleks” a “long way form home” … but at least it’s got a “sarcasam warning”.
Keep up the good work Iain.
April 28, 2011 at 2:16 am |
They constantly attack me for my politics
Wrong. Your politics might be shit but they arent any different from those of dozens of other wingnuts on the blogs. From what I can tell you have mainly been “attacked” for your stalky-ness and hypocricy.
and the quality of my writing
Wrong again.
deriding me because I have a role swap arrangement with my wife which gives me the time to blog.
If thats all it gave you the time to do then nobody would give a shit Iain. But you don’t just “blog” do you. You run dozens of blogs. Mostly about other people’s identities or, using other people’s comments and pictures.
Is really a rather dreary argument but mostly its because I have never just given up and surrendered to their attempts at bullying.
You mean you have never given up stalking and trolling and digging at Sear and others. Then you spin it like you yourself have done nothing wrong.
The blogs in question get almost no traffic, one of them has been kept private for years. and I don’t link to any of them form here.
Yeah so…. why not delete them then, as a sign of good will?
Stop kidding yourself that we are black mailing you. We suggested a fair and reasonable offer to unwind some of the old flame war stuff. It is not about forcing anyone to do anything. You will either do the right thing or you won’t. And if you don’t then we will restore the ‘status quo’ and put the ED stuff back online. ANd we will all be back to square one.
Now stop whining to your fans like the fat spotty kid at school who noone likes and START DOING THE RIGHT FU*CKING THING!!
April 28, 2011 at 1:29 pm |
[...] that brings me to the latest whine from “Len Saxby Davidson” which will get a detailed [...]
April 30, 2011 at 4:02 pm |
Today Iain slams a published author, suggesting her book should go straight into “the bargian bin” (which shows precisely why Iain is not a published author).
Then Ray appears, hinting at something he doesn’t have the testiculos to actually say out loud.
Hmm, maybe that ED stuff should go back online after all.
May 1, 2011 at 3:55 pm |
Ray is supporting Iain’s veiled stalking. They both will be back up.
May 8, 2011 at 9:36 pm |
LOL. Iain giving Bolt advice on set design. Perhaps Iain would rather the set be decorated with cheap flashing signs and useless items from a $2 shop. Similar to his blog design and flashing GIFs.
And LOL Ray. His trolling effort on Dave G resulted in thoughtful comments from the likes of Stalker Jimbo Dunnel. He’s borrowed Iain’s MO. Use a photo of his enemy then carp on in a 1000 words or more about how right he (Ray) is.
Fuckwit.
May 10, 2011 at 1:47 pm |
Funny how Reg carps and whines about Husky Jim being a troll and a stalker (which is fair enough, because he is) – but never bothers to ask Iain why HJ gets such a free rein there. Meanwhile, Iain just laughs while they slug it out, like the comment-craving trollmaster he is.
Any word on the new ED pages yet?
May 10, 2011 at 9:10 pm |
I have discovered that there is no need to re upload the ED pages as they are still available online:
http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/Iain_Hall
http://encyclopediadramatica.ch/Ray_Dixon
Gentlemen, update your links!!
May 11, 2011 at 11:40 am |
Iain is trying really hard at Lavatus recently and continually failing to even remotely keep up.
May 11, 2011 at 12:12 pm |
Well spotted. This thread is quite funny – watch as Iain attempts to bait a bunch of lefty commenters, only to be ridiculed for his stupidity and hilariously garbled metaphors.
May 11, 2011 at 2:50 pm |
He has a point though… I wouldn’t like to come home to find an asylum seeker has burgled my house and salted all my food. It’s a serious issue!
May 11, 2011 at 3:58 pm |
Iain really doesn’t like salt even tho he’s so attracted to it; he’s such a slug.
May 18, 2011 at 3:20 pm |
Photo thief Iain Hall should take note
“Receiving a photograph obtained from a Facebook account without the user’s permission is the same as receiving a stolen TV, Queensland Police have said after the arrest of a Fairfax journalist.”
http://m.theage.com.au/technology/technology-news/facebook-breakins-police-say-receiving-photos-like-taking-stolen-tvs-20110518-1esad.html
I’m sure Iain’s theft from Flckr also counts.
May 29, 2011 at 6:21 pm |
A good post today from Iain ‘Cat Meat’ Hall-aily. Apparently if women are raped late at night its because they arent wearing enough clothes. The bloke who does the rapist is just an opportunist. Like in the animal kingdom!
Iain, you truly are a fucking idiot. So are you Reg Dickerson (for calling Jo Chandler a slut.)
May 31, 2011 at 4:02 pm |
Don’t worry Len, just wait until Iain sees this:
A foreign student who sexually assaulted seven victims claimed he was upset at the way Australian women dressed and behaved. Libyan masters student Almahde Ahmad Atagore, 28, was this morning jailed for at least three years.
So was it the dirty foreign immigrant or an opportunistic attack on girls who were flaunting their sexuality? Poor old Iain won’t know whether he’s coming or going. But he’ll probably just settle for blaming the Greens.
May 31, 2011 at 4:04 pm |
Oh, and don’t be too concerned about Reg. He hasn’t got the stomach to say what’s really on his mind about Jo Chandler, so all he can manage is petty sexism and name-calling.
May 31, 2011 at 8:52 pm |
“But he’ll probably just settle for blaming the Greens….”. LOL…
June 1, 2011 at 1:13 pm |
Looks like Iain’s racism wins out over his sexism, Barton. Three days later he was blabbering about how scantily-clad women trigger primeval sexual tripwires in the male brain. But that argument doesn’t apply when a dirty foreign Muslim uses it as mitigation.
June 1, 2011 at 2:52 pm |
Yes indeed, his racial prejudice remains unrelenting and further his complete self absorption without even a hint of self awareness is remarkable to behold.
June 3, 2011 at 1:31 pm |
ROFLMAO at Dickson…
I wonder if Zane realises he’s participating in st*lking by even commenting there and that under the laws of Queensland at least (maybe in Victoria too) he could be charged for harassing you online?
Call up those coppers Reg. Tell them to get cracking. Forget investigating murders, manslaughter, armed robbery, rape, road rage, bestiality, assault, fraud, traffic offences…. “SOMEONE IS SAYING STUFF ABOUT ME ON THE INTERNET!!”
June 3, 2011 at 1:35 pm |
Geee I am mortified. I mean to think that I could even remotely be considered….shame upon shame….how can I live with myself from now on…?
June 5, 2011 at 9:53 am |
Nice bit of hardcore stalkology in the latest at the cesspit. This man needs to be locked up.
June 5, 2011 at 11:47 am |
any publicity is good publicity…
June 5, 2011 at 1:48 pm |
While
stalkingperusing his personal website (which is rather dreary)Yes, it’s far too minimalistic and grey-chic. You need to get the decorators in, Zane. Gather as many colour images, gadgets, emoticons and animated GIFs as you find. Plaster them all over the page with no apparent structure or purpose. And get rid of the coherent text too (spelling gaffes and long, pretentious and disjointed sentences are the new ‘in’ thing in blogging).
Once your site looks like Luna Park inhabited by a dyslexic moron, you’ll know you’ve hit the heady heights of Chez Hall.
June 5, 2011 at 1:57 pm |
Iain you’ve done your self proud this time the piece about Zane was a classic. Did you by chance swallow a dictionary? I thought I was reading Shakespeare no less, you are indeed a wasted talent.
June 5, 2011 at 3:00 pm |
I started to research this post because I was curious about the chap who has developed a very negative opinion about me and I was rather keen to find out why.
No Hall, you started to “research” it because you are a filthy stalker, and you reckon anyone who criticizes you is fair game for your creepy stalking and theft of photographs. Then you try to dress up your stalking ways as serious blogging. Youre a dingleberry hanging precariously from the anus of society Iain.
June 5, 2011 at 6:13 pm |
I love the way Hall ends his diatribe with a link to a bad review of my music, as if the great internet warrior yet again reveals the awful truth, when in fact it is the first one I quote from on my own site! LOL.
June 6, 2011 at 9:05 am |
It fits the pattern. Bested Hall in a string of arguments? Prepare to see your name up in lights at the cesspit.
June 6, 2011 at 1:21 pm |
I’m not sure the review of your music was entirely critical, Zane. Plus you’d be hard pressed to find a review of Iain’s ‘work’ that opens up with “Iain Hall has had an extremely distinguished career in Australian blogging…” Except for those he’s written himself, that is.
June 8, 2011 at 2:01 pm |
“I am actually quite well read when it comes to Art and Art history and my opinion does not come form any shortcomings in my “art education”.”
Chez as usual being his modest self. Hey Iain, explaining art to a Philistine like you is like giving strawberries to swine. If you per chance ventured into an art gallery, the damn thing would no doubt burst into flames.
June 8, 2011 at 2:30 pm |
In 1911 Adolf Hitler, who had nursed ambitions of becoming a professional artist, had to settle for painting cheap and tacky postcards. He blamed Jewish intellectuals for his lack of advancement in the arts.
In 2011 Iain Hall, who had nursed ambitions of becoming a professional artist, had to settle for cramming his blog full of tawdry animation and lurid colours. He blamed “Latte Sippers” for his lack of advancement in the arts.
(If only WordPress was around in Hitler’s day, it might have saved the world some grief.)
June 8, 2011 at 2:51 pm |
Ahhhh, I was not aware that Noddy Hall had tried his hand at art and as usual failed. This explains his bitter and twisted hatred of anything remotely artistic then, and especially of those who manage to scratch a living from it. Thank you Ms Plath for this insight into the glutinous mass that is his excuse for a brain. Does this mean that the ridiculously badly painted portrait of him on his site is self-generated?
June 8, 2011 at 3:05 pm |
ahhhh #2. Upon re-reading his diatribe I know see that he did try his hand. My mistake, should have realised.
June 8, 2011 at 9:54 pm |
” Does this mean that the ridiculously badly painted portrait of him on his site is self-generated?”
No. This was painted by an elephant at the Brisbane zoo. Jumbo as she is affectionately known, painted it after seeing a picture of Hall in an episode of Australia’s most wanted.
June 9, 2011 at 12:21 pm |
LOL lynot.
Iain thinks art is about communication, and having something to say. He is spot on. When I look at the self portrait on his blog, it is very clear to me what Iain is trying to tell us:
“I can’t paint for shit”
June 9, 2011 at 2:24 pm |
Last week the failed artist was crapping on about how women who ‘dress provocatively’ shouldn’t be surprised if they get raped by some drunken loon, because it’s “natural” and the “law of the jungle”.
Today he reckons that men who impregnate women after a five-minute fumble (probably 30 seconds in Iain’s case) should be entitled to some legal claim over their bodies. And he’s also OK with some maladjusted creep stalking his ex-girlfriend online (no surprise there).
Seems like Iain’s misogyny just won’t stay in his pants. Fortunately the angel-Sax-Reg coven at Jeez Hall appear to have been walking erect for a while longer, so have correctly taken him to task.
June 9, 2011 at 5:28 pm |
Look Reggie me ol China,, I’m of the opinion it is definitely a womens choice and no other fucker’s if she has some chumps baby or not, but really Reggie – This!!!
” Thinking about that – and looking at him – I’m surprised he even had a girlfriend. But I’m not surprised she wouldn’t want to bring his offspring into the world. She’s done us a favour.”
Look mate the dude concerned ain’t no Adonis to be sure, but along side your ugly kisser, he looks like an expensive oil painting. (Not one from Chez Hall mind you) Look Reg, truth is, you wouldn’t get a root in a wood yard or, a brothel with a fistful of hundred dollar bills. A definite two bag job, one on yours and definitely one on hers, in case yours falls off.
June 10, 2011 at 5:16 pm |
Reading Angel’s LOL-worthy pawnage of thin-skinned Dixon today was well worth it.
June 10, 2011 at 9:26 pm |
Yes indeed. Now I wonder who “angel” is…
LOL
June 12, 2011 at 3:07 pm |
Reg is fighting the good fight over at the Dungpit. Leon stamps his foot and shouts I want an election and I want it now. The other morons join in and follow suit. Sax the constitutional lawyer (its the vibe of the thing) explains why their must be an election. “angle” and “gagdopey” have their say. The walls of the Dungpit bulge with their collective stupidity.
Never mind Reg. Still…. this is what you get when you make your bed with right wing freaks and bearded crap artists.
June 12, 2011 at 3:11 pm |
PS. Here is today’s look a like…..
Leon Bertrand
http://kellernallandbrown.webs.com/DSCF2567.JPG
Another political loser
http://bit.ly/ieuI15
June 13, 2011 at 1:05 pm |
It’s not like me to comment here but is that really Leon? My God.
June 13, 2011 at 2:36 pm |
.
“It’s not like me to comment here but is that really Leon? My God.”
You should come back more often Reggie, you may just like it here.
After all Reggie you can insult us here and we get to return the favour. Unlike Chez Hall where you get to insult people with no right of reply from your victim. Something you might find absolutely astonishing here Reggie, not everyone is a know all about everything. There are no Astronomers, Physicists, Doctors Lawyers Jumbo Jet pilots, and no talking pigs.But most importantly no stalkers.
June 13, 2011 at 4:25 pm |
He’d struggle to make a living on the streets, Raymond.
June 13, 2011 at 5:46 pm |
Stalkwatchers, the Wankpit today is melting down faster than a Japanese reactor. It kicked off in the thread about Gillard and has been getting worse all day.
Reg accuses Sax of being David Davidson
Sax accuses Reg of being Sockpuppet
Reg admits to being Sockpuppet
Sax posts a link to Reg’s ED page
Reg deletes Sax’s comment about Reg’s ED page
Sax says the contents of Reg’s ED page is correct
Reg says he’s right about everything (no shock there)
This could be the end of life as we know it. Reg may end up having to find somewhere else to blog. Iain may end up having to find a job.
p.s. nice work to secret agent “angel” for pushing Reg’s buttons
June 13, 2011 at 9:49 pm |
Why thankyou, no problem.
June 13, 2011 at 11:27 pm |
Oh the LOLs:
PKD: Wow – Ray finally admits to being the sewer Sock despite all your strenuous lies, err denials when I pinged you on it before Ray.
What a surprise – not.
Ray: Most of it was parody PKD. Sorry you didn’t get it
PKD: Most of it was stupid mindless drivel Ray, sorry if you didn’t realise it.
~
Most of it was complete bullshit. The rest of it was veiled stalking and harassment. Dickson, mate, you’re a dickhead liar. “Your laughable evidence is tenuous at the least”. No fuckface, it was spot fucking on. You and Hall shat bricks and tried to lie and deceive your way out of it posting bullshit screen grabs of IP addresses etc et al and so on and so on.
Hall is too stupid to realise you’re a cancer on his blog. Driving away his regular commenters and attracting people to push your buttons so you lose your shit for the lulz.
And as far a your dickpuppet returning, mate, your posts are about as funny and well though out as Michael Richards “Nigger” routine.
Take a break, Ray. You’re fucked.
June 13, 2011 at 11:31 pm |
That thread is utterly hilarious. The whole ridiculous edifice is tumbling down around their ears.
Love your work Reg. Having exhausted your welcome in Bright and on several blogs, you’ve now worn it out at the Armpit. From today you’ll be about as popular there as a pile of cat sick.
Nice work gents – stay classy.
June 14, 2011 at 12:00 am |
Dixon and Hall you have both been exposed as a pair of liars. Just in case the people here have forgotten the crap you spouted over “Sockpuppet”, then heres a reminder…
Reg
“I am not Sock Puppet you fool and your tenuous evidence is just laughable. Really pathetic … you’ve now named two incorrect people as the notorious SockPuppet.”
“I am not Sockpuppet – but why am I bothering to even say it to you. See you later – you are real idiot.”
“The SP who wrote the abovementioned posts is not the same person that originally started making comments at Iain’s blog under that name. Iain asked that person if he wished to continue using the name and when he declined the nickname was assigned to me. So you’ve probably got your facts wrong (again).”
“I just want to reiterate that he has once again named the wrong person. I am not Sock Puppet.”
Iain
“Rumours that he [Sockpuppet] is an undercover hotelier have been proven to be entirely groundless and his true identity remains a mystery to one and all…”
“To those scum bags stalking Socky I just can’t help laughing, that they have so little to back up their second attempt to out him. Fail, again!!!”
“The very best that they have is a very weak circumstantial case But I am not going to dwell upon it for any more time than deserves , their argument is utter baloney.”
“So after fronting up and shouting the odds about their prowess as defectives detectives they have smeared and pilloried Ray Dixon with nothing but a weak circumstantial argument.”
“I feel that their continued refusal to accept our flat out denials that SockPuppet is Ray Dixon means that I do have an obligation to Ray ( along with Nadia S, an innocent party here) to demonstrate that they are wrong.”
The question is….. if you wankers are lying about this, what else are you lying about? PKD and Sax and angel are all onto you. Hall you’d better do something about the loose cannon in your midst or pretty soon your blog is going to have less visitors than Maralinga circa 1958.
June 14, 2011 at 1:16 am |
I’ve just released some comments from the spam bin, folks.
No, not yours, Husky Jim.
June 14, 2011 at 1:59 pm |
As Ray has pointed out the character was never more than a bit of a lark
Ah yes, the stock-standard Iain Hall defence, wheeled out when he’s caught stalking or impersonating others or running sockpuppets: “It was only satire”.
If it was all just a “bit of a lark” Beardy, why did the pair of you go to such lengths (faked screengrabs of IPs and what-not) to claim that Reg wasn’t “Sockpuppet”?
Reg is p*ssing off just about all of your commenters and killing your blog – and now you’ve made him a ‘regular poster’. Nice management skills Iain. Did you used to make decisions like that when you were running the pizza shop (before it went broke)?
June 14, 2011 at 3:53 pm |
popped by to see what was happening. Ray Dixon of Bright finally admits that he is sockpuppet!.
That was never a secret. Why did the shit stain on society deny it tho? Because he knew he was a lying, stalking scumbag along with his mate Iain Hall the whole time. I think he realised he dug himself in a hole way too deep. The stupid thing is, he had a chance to get out of that hole, but now i see he is digging deeper by becoming a blogger at Chez Hall under his own name. Not a wise move I would think.
Whatever.
June 14, 2011 at 4:15 pm |
I just read that 200 plus comments where Ray Dixon of BRight dukes it out with angel and Sax and Craigy and LEon and … well, everyone.
I cant get over how he scolds them for getting ‘nasty’ and ‘personal’ when HE is the the one mocking Sax for being in mental health care. like this:-
Now, as you’ve turned rather nasty (again) and can’t help but spit out insults (a sure sign you’ve lost it), I will make that call to the CAT team to get you picked up and put back inside. Good day and do try to mind your manners in future. Btw, how was lunch? Did you throw your baked beans at the wall again?
Unfuckingbelievable!!!!!!!!!!!! ‘Hypocritical Blind Idiot’ is Ray Dixon of Bright’s middle name.
And he wonders why everyone fucking hates him!!!!!
June 14, 2011 at 5:23 pm |
The 200 plus comments have been heavily edited by Ray a few times since last night, Jake.
What the world needs to know and understand that everything is ok if Ray does it. Just not anyone else.
Nice work Sax & Angel.
June 14, 2011 at 7:26 pm |
Srsly? That’s so fucking pathetic. but I shouldnt be surprised. it is Ray Dixon after all. Can dish out shit but can’t take it.
June 14, 2011 at 8:58 pm |
Bill, they have been edited to shit. I had a good 20 removed. The quickest to go was when Ray said he knew who I was as had known me before and on googling that name was sent to a porn site. No I am not a porn actress and he hit that button so fast when I retaliated. Fact is I had no problem until he started being a PIG, how appropriate as events turned. I do have all of Ray’s insults stored though, for safe keeping!
Sax, Iain has blocked me (assuming it is Iain, who is to know). Know that I did try to help today.
June 15, 2011 at 8:54 am |
The quickest to go was when Ray said he knew who I was as had known me before and on googling that name was sent to a porn site. No I am not a porn actress…
Probably just as well, Angel, or you’d have Iain e-mailing you like fury, asking if you can source some freebies for him.
June 15, 2011 at 10:58 am |
Dear Stalkers and Stalkwatchers,
I am going to comment here about Ray Dixon, because he does not allow me to take him to task on his own sad blog.
Dixons post yesterday about the Collingwood FC is an act of criminal defamation. He reckons Collingwood is using steroids or some other performance drugs. He has no evidence, he is just pisssing in the wind because Collingwood is so good. Not with standing the fact that Geelong has beaten them this season and is undefeated. I guess the Geelong sides of 2007-9 and the Brisbane side of the early 2000s were also on the muscle juice if you use Dixons warped logic.
Dixon also winges that the AFL has a slack drug testing policy, straight after pointing to an article that explains that AFL drug testers are in Arizonia and woke up Collingwood players before dawn to test them!! Doesnt sound too slack to me Ray.
Ray Dixon’s problem is that he supports St Kilda which is a team of chronic underperformers with poor club management and a rotten club culture. They had their best chance to win a premiership last year but blew it. Now they are a club on the slide back down to the middle or lower end of the table. Ray is jealous of Collingwood’s on and off field success, and rightly so. There is more (circumstancial) evidence that St Kilda is full of schoolgirl impregnating dick photographing rapers than there is for Collingwood players being on the roids.
Anyway, thank you for letting me vent here.
June 15, 2011 at 2:30 pm |
That’s beautiful Jim. You can put it up at AO if you like. You’re on moderation for good reason (ie you’re sta*lking behaviour – online and in person).
June 15, 2011 at 5:34 pm |
Ray Dixon would appear to be a lying liar who lies.
June 15, 2011 at 6:56 pm |
I have never “challenged” your real identity, Sax, or anyone else’s here. I have no interest in your real identity or anyone else’s.
Except for every commenter on this blog and Iain’s blog, Ray Dixon.
June 15, 2011 at 9:54 pm |
This topic has come to my attention today. Regardless of the long standing grudges of the participants, of which i have almost no knowledge, it would seem that whoever made this work is right on the money even if some of the language is rather strong. http://i.imgur.com/rz1dW.png
Given the peculiars of the language my first instinct was that it was a creation of Graeme Bird but that contention becomes absurd when you consider the likelihood of that particular character having an interest in this topic.
June 15, 2011 at 11:16 pm |
Lulz.
June 16, 2011 at 10:27 am |
There was never any valid reason or necessity for me to admit that I was the SP author
What was the “valid reason or necessity” for you to tell lies and claim that you weren’t?
June 16, 2011 at 11:00 am |
The complete melee of the last few days over at the cat litter tray really shows up the “blog” for what it is. An embarrassing mess of viciousness and sick excuses for throwing insults.
It makes a mockery of any claim to serious blogging. And Reg has out done himself here, really shown himself up. I would also hazard that Noddy is not really aware of what he’s let himself in for by letting Reg take over, and Reg will take over. The last few posts already make Noddy look like a visitor to his own site. LOL.
June 16, 2011 at 11:13 am |
Okay, one more comment and then I’ll leave it at that (just being here actually makes me feel dirty):
Your blog is set up to attack and denigrate people – anonymously. You are stalking people and no one owes you the truth. Telling a lie here is like having a shit in the toilet – everyone does it. Elsewhere I never confirmed or denied the ownership of the SockPuppet character, simply because there was no need to. Now that the character is retired I’ve done so and, as I’ve said at Iain Hall’s, I’m more than happy to defend anything he wrote.
TWM, I don’t know you (or care to know your identity either). So whatever your beef is it’s something that is beyond me. But, the invitation to (calmly) discuss the issue you seem to have with my SP character is open. Just go back to the thread if you like. Same goes for everyone here.
Cheerio. It’s been a hoot.
June 16, 2011 at 11:36 am |
Hey Ray. Your Berg post would have made a perfect guest post at Pure Poison matey!
Also, for someone who thinks Twitter is useless and doesn’t use it, you report that Berg has “cracked the shits” on Twitter!
If that’s cracking the shits, I don’t know what you call your own outbursts, Ray!!
June 16, 2011 at 11:38 am |
Telling a lie here is like having a shit in the toilet – everyone does it. Elsewhere I never confirmed or denied the ownership of the SockPuppet character…
You’re still lying Ray. You denied it several times at Hall’s blog. Hall played along with your denials. PKD and “Sax” have both picked up on the fact that you lied about it there.
Zane is right – I can’t believe Hall has given you the keys to his blog. He’s already struggling for credibility, and then he gives the controls to someone who continually insults and provokes the few commenters he has. No wonder Iain had to leave the pizza business.
June 16, 2011 at 1:04 pm |
Ray you are a lying liar who lies, then you ever lie about lying. And you probably probably come back here and lie about the fact that you lied about lying.
As far as your argument that you can lie here because it’s a toilet, well you must have the same opinion of Iain Halls Cesspit because you lied through your teeth there too! And so did Hall. Here is the litany of your lies.
http://iainhall.wordpress.com/2009/11/09/wrong-again/
Wrong again! Fail, again!!! (Hall)
I am not going to dwell upon it for any more time than deserves , their argument is utter baloney. (Hall)
They have smeared and pilloried Ray Dixon (Hall)
“Bridgit Gread” was very quick off the mark to send me a series of gloating emails claiming that Socky’s identity has been found by the losers at scumbag central. She and they are actually entirely mistaken (Hall)
I feel that their continued refusal to accept our flat out denials that SockPuppet is Ray Dixon means that I do have an obligation to Ray to demonstrate that they are wrong. (Hall)
I just want to reiterate that he has once again named the wrong person. I am not Sock Puppet. (Dixon)
Who in their right mind would believe anything written at that infantile & anonymously authored blog? (Dixon)
I think the person in question needs to get in touch with me and apologise for what he’s done (Dixon)
How long do you think it will take for them to accept that you are not Ray Dixon? (Hall)
They really owe you an apology for the slurs upon your character and they should post an unreserved retraction of their claims. (Hall)
Ray you need help mate. Seek it urgently.
June 16, 2011 at 1:27 pm |
But I thought Ray never confirmed or denied it here or elsewhere?
June 16, 2011 at 2:56 pm |
“I never confirmed or denied the ownership of the SockPuppet character”.
Delusional disorder is a psychiatric diagnosis denoting a psychotic mental disorder that is characterized by holding one or more non-bizarre delusions in the absence of any other significant psychopathology. Non-bizarre delusions are fixed beliefs that are certainly and definitely false, but that could possibly be plausible.
June 16, 2011 at 3:24 pm |
Not to mention the several threads where Ray actually responded to “Sockpuppet” (and vice versa) and they referred to each other by name.
What’s that they say about talking to oneself?
June 16, 2011 at 3:39 pm |
Hearty lulaz at Dickson:
To my recollection I did not deny or confirm my ownership of the character SP … here. Or on my blog. Or on any other blog … except: at a blog that stal*ks people. No one owes them the truth. I think you know that.
I have already listed where you tolda da liez, Ray. Can’t wait for you to go back and try editing that article (don’t worry I’ve got screengrabs.)
Luckily “damage” “Sax” and Craigy are all onto your bullshit.
Then this from Hall:
We are having to contend with the sort of scum-bags who hacked my blogs and email accounts, who have tried every dirty trick under the sun so when they thought that they had trumps we decided to mess with them a bit and beat then at their own game, it worked a treat too
Yeah Iain it has worked wonders…. Dixon now looks like the biggest meat head on the internet, and both you and him have been exposed as chronic liars who have been giving each other reacharounds for months. And when the few people who comment on your blog take Dixon to task, you tell them all to f**k off and make him a ‘regular poster’. Sylvia is right, you have the management skills of Idi Amin. Keep it up and with in a month the only people reading your blog will be you, Dixon and Plastic Bertrand.
June 16, 2011 at 5:07 pm |
No-one need do anything, Ray the pig is taking down the sandpit by himself. Wake up Iain you are carrying a lot of baggage with the lying pig.
“I don’t know you (or care to know your identity either). So whatever your beef is it’s something that is beyond me. But, the invitation to (calmly) discuss the issue you seem to have with my SP character is open. Just go back to the thread if you like. Same goes for everyone here.”
The voices in his head think everyone is out to get him. Paranoia controls the little man. Everyone but myself has the invitation, wonder why he is so scared of me? BTW Iain said he will come to the table with me if I give him my name, address and phone number, yeah right a discussion about Ray’s future is what he is after!
June 16, 2011 at 11:17 pm |
PKD and “Sax” have both picked up on the fact that you lied about it there.
Yeah, Ray flat out lied about it – but that was on an open blog, although well after he had been truly outed.
But I also have a much earlier offline email from Iain where he flat out denied it was Ray which was pretty lame. Its a shame he couldn’t be honest offline even to someone who doesn’t really have that much interest in his whole sorry saga.
Oh and Iain – I am putting this here deliberately because I really don’t appreciate emails from you telling me where I can and can’t comment on.
It’s not ‘sleeping with the enemy’ as you put it, so you and the Sock can get over it!
Ta!
June 16, 2011 at 11:19 pm |
Oh and Sock, Your defense of your ‘harmless’ parody posts as the pig is laughable.
If its all harmless parody then WTF was Fukyoushima a parody of? A bogan motel owner in the sticks with extreme xenophobia of outsiders is abut the only thing I can think of.
In which case you nailed it matey – awesome parody!
June 17, 2011 at 12:15 am |
Let’s consider some of the content of Ray Dixon’s hilarious “harmless parodies”:
* a post alleging that a woman making a claim for sexual harrassment was just doing it for the money
* a post alleging that two teenage schoolgirls were having lesbian sex, and that the older one might be breaking the law in doing so
* a post attacking Catherine Deveney and calling her a “freakin fruit cake”
* a post attacking and slurring Marieke Hardy, calling her “nauseating”
* a post attacking Christine Nixon for being “fat” and addicted to “Hungry Jacks’
* a post suggesting that a woman whose Facebook was hacked and flooded with porn did it herself to attract publicity
* posts that contain pictures of various women, accompanied by personal and insulting commentary about their appearance
* a post hacking into Jason Wilson, calling him “Australia’s self-proclaimed leading social media expert”
* a post with a caption of Rob Oakeshott and his indigenous wife, with a caption that suggested she was a “boat person”
* a post referring to the Greens as “the Gay Greens”, and irrelevant references to “gays” and “poofs” in every third post
* a post calling Uruguayans a “3rd world country of cuntry type spicks” and one of their footballers a “cheating lowlife llama-humping monobrowed hillbilly”
If any anonymous or pseudonymous commentator said any of those things about Dixon, he’d fly into a rage, scream “stop the personal attacks”, delete comments, pitch three types of fit, then accuse them of defamation, stalking and/or mental impairment.
But when the Alpine Pig-Poser does it, well, it’s just “harmless parody”. Yeah, right. No wonder you were too cowardly to own up to it.
June 17, 2011 at 12:19 am |
Oh and Iain – I am putting this here deliberately because I really don’t appreciate emails from you telling me where I can and can’t comment on.
Don’t worry PKD, I doubt Iain will ban you. After Ray’s pathetic efforts this week he’ll be short of commenters; he’ll need all he can get.
June 18, 2011 at 12:38 pm |
Reg’s tactic on the “good cop or bad cop” thread is hilarious, he wants everyone to just stop talking about the fact he is/was Sockpuppet (understandable since he has had his ass kicked for the past week)…
Are you alright, Sax? Seriously, putting all animosity aside, you sound like you’re unravelling a bit. I’m sorry if all this has gotten to you, but no one (me included) wishes you any ill will. Let’s move on, eh?
You can move on if you like Reg, but we all know its only a matter of time until your shit stirring and holier than thou attitude gets you into more strife.